3rd USA presidential debate: National Debt; rising debt to GDP ratio; financial burden of social security and medicare

Transcript of the part on USA national debt, rising debt to GDP ratio, and handling financial burden of social security and medicare, from around 1 hr. 23 min 40 secs in the 3rd presidential debate video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ye0Xblp_Nb0, is given below.

Moderator, Chris Wallace: Mr. Trump, Secretary Clinton - no, we need to move on to our final segment, and that is the national debt, which has not been discussed until tonight.

Our national debt, as a share of the economy, our GDP, is now 77 percent. That's the highest since just after World War II. But the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget says, Secretary Clinton, under your plan, debt would rise to 86 percent of GDP over the next 10 years. Mr. Trump, under your plan, they say it would rise to 105 percent of GDP over the next 10 years. The question is, why are both of you ignoring this problem? Mr. Trump, you go first.

Donald Trump: Well, I say they're wrong, because I'm going to create tremendous jobs. And we're bringing GDP from, really 1 percent, which is what it is now, and if she got in, it will be less than zero. But we're bringing it from 1 percent up to 4 percent. And I actually think we can go higher than 4 percent. I think you can go to 5 percent or 6 percent. And if we do, you don't have to bother asking your question, because we have a tremendous machine. We will have created a tremendous economic machine once again. To do that, we're taking back jobs. We're not going to let our companies be raided by other countries where we lose all our jobs, we don't make our product anymore. It's very sad. But I'm going to create a - the kind of a country that we were from the standpoint of industry. We used to be there. We've given it up. We've become very, very sloppy.

We've had people that are political hacks making the biggest deals in the world, bigger than companies. You take these big companies, these trade deals are far bigger than these companies, and yet we don't use our great leaders, many of whom back me and many of whom back Hillary, I must say. But we don't use those people. Those are the people - these are the greatest negotiators in the world. We have the greatest businesspeople in the world. We have to use them to negotiate our trade deals. We use political hacks. We use people that get the position because they gave - they made a campaign contribution and they're dealing with China and people that are very much smarter than they are. So we have to use our great people.

But that being said, we will create an economic machine the likes of which we haven't seen in many decades. And people, Chris, will again go back to work and they'll make a lot of money. And we'll have companies that will grow and expand and start from new.

Wallace: Secretary Clinton?

Hillary Clinton: Well, first, when I hear Donald talk like that and know that his slogan is "Make America Great Again," I wonder when he thought America was great. And before he rushes and says, "You know, before you and President Obama were there," I think it's important to recognize that he has been criticizing our government for decades.

You know, back in 1987, he took out a one hundred thousand dollar ad in the New York Times, during the time when President Reagan was president, and basically said exactly what he just said now, that we were the laughingstock of the world. He was criticizing President Reagan. This is the way Donald thinks about himself, puts himself into, you know, the middle and says, "You know, I alone can fix it," as he said on the convention stage.

But if you look at the debt, which is the issue you asked about, Chris, I pay for everything I'm proposing. I do not add a penny to the national debt. I take that very seriously, because I do think it's one of the issues we've got to come to grips with. So when I talk about how we're going to pay for education, how we're going to invest in infrastructure, how we're going to get the cost of prescription drugs down, and a lot of the other issues that people talk to me about all the time, I've made it very clear we are going where the money is. We are going to ask the wealthy and corporations to pay their fair share.

And there is no evidence whatsoever that that will slow down or diminish our growth. In fact, I think just the opposite. We'll have what economists call middle-out growth. We've got to get back to rebuilding the middle class, the families of America. That's where growth will come from. That's why I want to invest in you. I want to invest in your family. And I think that's the smartest way to grow the economy, to make the economy fairer.
....
Trump: Because I did disagree with Ronald Reagan very strongly on trade. I disagreed with him. We should have been much tougher on trade even then. I've been waiting for years. Nobody does it right.

Wallace: OK.

Trump: And frankly, now we're going to do it right.

Wallace: All right. The one last area I want to get into with you in this debate is the fact that the biggest driver of our debt is entitlements, which is 60 percent of all federal spending. Now, the Committee for federal -- a Responsible Federal Budget has looked at both of your plans and they say neither of you has a serious plan that is going to solve the fact that Medicare's going to run out of money in the 2020s, Social Security is going to run out of money in the 2030s, and at that time, recipients are going to take huge cuts in their benefits.

So, in effect, the final question I want to ask you in this regard is - and let me start with you, Mr. Trump, would President Trump make a deal to save Medicare and Social Security that included both tax increases and benefit cuts, in effect, a grand bargain on entitlements?

Trump: I'm cutting taxes. We're going to grow the economy. It's going to grow at a record rate of growth.

Wallace: That's not going to help in the entitlements.

Trump: No, it's going to totally help you. And one thing we have to do: Repeal and replace the disaster known as Obamacare. It's destroying our country. It's destroying our businesses, our small business and our big businesses. We have to repeal and replace Obamacare.

You take a look at the kind of numbers that that will cost us in the year '17, it is a disaster. If we don't repeal and replace - now, it's probably going to die of its own weight. But Obamacare has to go. It's - the premiums are going up 60, 70, 80 percent. Next year they're going to go up over 100 percent.

And I'm really glad that the premiums have started - at least the people see what's happening, because she wants to keep Obamacare and she wants to make it even worse, and it can't get any worse. Bad health care at the most expensive price. We have to repeal and replace Obamacare.

Wallace: And, Secretary Clinton, same question, because at this point, Social Security and Medicare are going to run out, the trust funds are going to run out of money. Will you as president entertain - will you consider a grand bargain, a deal that includes both tax increases and benefit cuts to try to save both programs?

Clinton: Well, Chris, I am on record as saying that we need to put more money into the Social Security Trust Fund. That's part of my commitment to raise taxes on the wealthy. ...

But what we want to do is to replenish the Social Security Trust Fund by making sure that we have sufficient resources, and that will come from either raising the cap and/or finding other ways to get more money into it. I will not cut benefits. I want to enhance benefits for low-income workers and for women who have been disadvantaged by the current Social Security system.

But what Donald is proposing with these massive tax cuts will result in a 20 trillion dollar additional national debt. That will have dire consequences for Social Security and Medicare.

And I'll say something about the Affordable Care Act, which he wants to repeal. The Affordable Care Act extended the solvency of the Medicare Trust Fund. So if repeals it, our Medicare problem gets worse. What we need to do is go after the long-term health care drivers. We've got to get costs down, increase value, emphasize wellness. I have a plan for doing that. And I think that we will be able to get entitlement spending under control by/with more resources and harder decisions.
---- end transcript of segment of debate video ----

Here's a full transcript (annotated) of the debate, The final Trump-Clinton debate transcript, annotated, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/19/the-final-trump-clinton-debate-transcript-annotated/, Oct. 19th 2016

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt-to-GDP_ratio, "In 2016, United States public debt-to-GDP ratio was estimated at 71.8% or 104.5%, including external debt."

Ravi: I understand that to mean that 2016 USA Federal debt without external debt is 71.8% (according to wiki) but with external debt it goes up to 104.5%. The moderator of the above mentioned debate said, "Our national debt, as a share of the economy, our GDP, is now 77 percent. That's the highest since just after World War II." So I think the moderator would not have included external debt in the 77 percent figure he quoted.

Here's a graph from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, USA giving USA Federal debt (including external debt, I guess) from around 1965 to 2016:



[Source: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GFDEGDQ188S. Note that this graph is shown by the wiki page mentioned earlier, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt-to-GDP_ratio]

Here's another graph of USA debt (including external debt, I guess) from 1900 to perhaps 2015, http://www.economicshelp.org/wp-content/uploads/blog-uploads/2011/08/us-debt1900-2015.jpg. Note the spike around World War II years.

Please note that I have a PUBLICLY NEUTRAL informal-student-observer role in these posts that I put up about the USA presidential elections. Of course, as I am an Indian citizen living in India, there is no question of me voting in these elections.

[I thank Commission on Presidential Debates (http://www.debates.org/), wikipedia, stlouisfed.org and washingtonpost.com and have presumed that they will not have any objections to me sharing the above transcript/extracts of/from their youtube video/websites on this post which is freely viewable by all, and does not have any financial profit motive whatsoever.]

Comments

Archive

Show more